The decision,
which is subject to a 60-day review by the Obama administration and is likely
to be appealed, is an eye-catching if narrow victory for Apple in its
complicated legal skirmish for smartphone supremacy with Google (GOOG), maker
of the Android software that powers the HTC phones at issue here as well as
dozens of others.
Android is now the
most widely used mobile operating system, but Apple's iPhone remains the most
popular single smartphone. Apple's late CEO Steve Jobs complained to biographer
Walter Isaacson that much of Android's technology was pilfered from Apple.
"I'm going to destroy Android, because it's a stolen product,"
Isaacson quoted Jobs as saying. "I'm willing to go thermonuclear war on
this."
In Monday's
ruling, one of the first cases between Apple and a smartphone-maker using
Android, the Cupertino company claimed that Taiwan-based HTC, one of the
fastest-growing players in the mobile- phone industry and the No. 3 smartphone
provider in the United States, infringed two of the patents governing the
technology behind the iPhone. The trade panel found that only one of the
patents -- which allows users to tap on a phone number in an email and
immediately be connected -- had been infringed by HTC.
In a statement,
HTC downplayed the significance of the disputed "data-tapping"
feature and said it "will completely remove it from all of our phones
soon."
"This it just
one more step in a long process," said Bijal V. Vakil, a partner in White
& Case's intellectual property practice and executive partner of its
Silicon Valley office who was not involved in the case. "This is not a
disastrous ruling at all for HTC."
An Apple spokesman
could not be immediately reached for a comment.
It's unclear what
impact the ruling may have on consumers. One thing is certain: More and more
legal rulings will increasingly affect the kinds of smartphones we use. This
case was just part of an avalanche of patent litigation in recent years as
companies try to legally outmaneuver their competitors in the booming smartphone
industry.
After suing HTC in
March 2010, Apple initiated litigation with Motorola in October 2010 and with
Samsung in April 2011. Just between Apple and Samsung, there are more than 30
lawsuits. Also, Oracle (ORCL) has sued Google, claiming Android violates its
patents and copyrights. And Microsoft is suing Motorola Mobility over Android.
Cases often
trigger countersuits or pre-emptive legal moves as defendants jockey for
competitive advantage. Google, for example, has accused its competitors of
"a hostile, organized campaign against Android" being waged through
"bogus patents."
With Google's
Android system now the most widely used software on smartphones, an order
barring or cutting back on the number of HTC phones entering the country would
have severe repercussions at the retail level.
But, said patent
blogger Florian Mueller, "HTC is not locked out of the market by any
means. I'm not sure what their workaround will look like or whether users will
notice any change in service as a result. But Apple will have to be much more
successful in enforcing its patents in the future. They're still far, far away
from Steve Jobs' vow to kill Android."
The case that the
six-member trade commission ruled on Monday is complicated. Apple initially
accused HTC of infringing 10 patents, but six were dropped for various reasons.
Then in the
summer, Apple enjoyed a bit of legal tail wind when an ITC judge issued a
preliminary ruling that HTC had infringed two of Apple's patents, including one
that covers the technology used to find data in an email, such as a phone
number, and then enables the user to automatically dial the number by touching
it -- the so- called "data-tapping" feature. The judge's ruling was
forwarded to the full commission, which made its ruling Monday.
"This is the
one of the first two patent infringement complaints Apple ever brought against
Android," said patent blogger Mueller. "It's the first such case in
the United States to reach the stage of an actual ruling that is not just a
ruling on a motion for a preliminary injunction."
The Apple-HTC patent
battle
The dispute: Apple
claimed that Taiwan-based HTC, one of the fastest-growing players in the
mobile-phone industry and the No. 3 smartphone provider in the United States,
infringed on two of the patents governing the technology behind the iPhone
The ruling: The
trade panel found that only one of the patents -- which allows users to tap on
a phone number in an e-mail and immediately be connected -- had been infringed
by HTC.
No comments:
Post a Comment