Monday, February 27, 2012

Apple May Hike Clone Fees According to Exclusive Report on Computer Reseller News Online at http://www.crn.com


Apple Computer Inc. (Nasdaq-NNM: AAPL) is considering raising the licensing fees for Macintosh clone makers, a development that some sources claim could make it prohibitively expensive for some clone makers.

"We are looking at it and rethinking it with our licensees," acknowledged Guerrino DeLuca, executive vice president of marketing at Apple Computer Inc. "We are considering the entire licensing relationship. We may raise the price (under certain contractual provisions) and lower it in others."

Sources at Apple said that clone licensing fees could climb significantly. Under one proposal being floated at Apple, clone makers would pay Apple $100 to $1,100 per system sold, according to a source inside the company. The fee would vary with the price/performance of the computer. It is unclear how much clone makers are currently shelling out. But the re-negotiations could constitute a huge fee increase overall, effectively pricing some clone makers out of the market, sources said.

One Apple employee familiar with the licensing proposals said some changes being considered would effectively "get us out of the licensing business in a few months ... This will create an environment that makes it impossible to clone."

DeLuca said that a decision on new licensing fees has not been made yet. Further, he said, any decision will have to take a variety of factors into account, including incremental sales and market share being driven by the clone manufacturers.

"The licensees have gained market share for Apple. They are growing share, and that is a good thing," he said. "The relationship we have with our licensees has less to do with our contract and more to do with our business relationship."

"The people you are talking to have only seen part of the movie," he added. DeLuca would not comment on or discuss specific licensing fees proposals.

At the center of the licensing re-negotiations is Tempo, the version of the Macintosh operating system to be released this summer, said company sources. Clone manufacturers hold licenses for Apple's Macintosh System 7. They do not have licenses for System 8.

Until now, Tempo has not had a number designation. Today, however, Vito Salvaggio, director of OS releases, told CRN Online that Tempo is a significant enough upgrade to be called a System 8 release.

"Tempo will be called OS 8," he said. "It's a pretty significant release." Salvaggio would not comment on how the designation would affect licensees.

Ironically, the news comes at a time when clone manufacturers recently raised Apple's market share. San Diego-based Computer Intelligence Inc. said that Apple and the clone makers constituted 11.2 percent of the business market for computers in January, up from 9.5 percent in December and 7.8 percent in November.

Those sales, though, have cannibalized some of Apple's. Apple insiders said that DeLuca once said that clone manufacturers cost Apple $1 million a day. DeLuca said the statement was taken out of context. The figure arose from a hypothetical centered on gross margin considerations, said Deluca.

Some insiders fear that Apple's licensing division will be gutted in the upcoming restructuring, which is to be unveiled March 14.

Apple Chairman Gilbert Amelio will unveil Apple's restructuring plan on March 14, according to an E-mail sent to Apple's 13,000-plus employees. Amelio is expected to close down certain divisions and projects, including Pippin and possibly Newton, according to various analysts.

Four thousand or more Apple employees are expected to get laid off during the restructuring, said various sources. Layoffs will be announced a week or so after the March 14 restructuring, said one Apple source. In other CRN Online Breaking News stories, Computer Reseller News Online is also posting Amelio's memo announcing the layoffs to Apple employees. Following is the full text of that document CRN has obtained:

From: Gil Amelio
To: Apple people--everywhere
I know all of you are wondering how the work of analyzing and restructuring the company is going, and, more importantly, when we will have definitive information about the future of your job.

Last month, I outlined a schedule that said we would complete our comprehensive analysis of the company by the end of February, and that by early March we would be in a better position to know what areas of the business we will pursue in the future and the personnel resources required to support these projects.

A great deal of work has gone on since then to define a new Apple Computer. We have implemented a new functional organization structure that consolidates the company's product development, marketing, sales, support and operations efforts into groups sharply focused on Apple's strategy. We have also completed the appointment of managers to run these groups. They are now making firm decisions concerning both the projects and activities that are key to our core business as well as the personnel reductions that we will begin implementing this month.

With the completion of this business plan, we will know what personnel resources are required to support the new structure. So, on March 14 we are planning to give more details on what we'll do and what we won't do in the future, the number of layoffs and the charge we will make to our second- quarter earnings to fund the reduction.

I also promised last month that we will almost completely refresh Apple's product line in 1997, and we've begun to deliver on that promise. On February 17th we introduced the world's fastest laptop--the PowerBook 3400--a complete new line of Power Macintosh computers, the eMate 300 mobile computer for K-12 education customers, the MessagePad 2000 mobile Internet computer, and the QuickTake 200 digital camera.

The reviews of these products have been very positive.

Congratulations to all who helped bring them to market. We are supporting the announcement with an aggressive advertising campaign that began last week. In the next thirty days we will announce more products that again demonstrate that we are focused on specific customer sets. Let's remember in the coming days that our mission is to develop, manufacture and sell great products. Please keep up the good work in this area.

Without great products, there is no Apple.

I know these are very difficult times for everyone. I continue to be amazed and appreciative of your tireless efforts as we work to achieve a shared goal: the return of Apple as a healthy leader of a rapidly changing industry.

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Brick Court QC seals Ryanair victory in Gatwick ground charges face-off.

The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) has ruled that Gatwick Airport's baggage handling and check-in charges are unfair, forcing it to revise the fees.

Nabarro partner Peter Fitzpatrick instructed Brick Court Chambers' Daniel Jowell QC to lead the legal fight for Ryanair against Gatwick Airport.

It argued that charges for check-in and baggage facilities were inherently unfair on clients and breached EU regulations on access to the ground handling market at EU airports.

Under the regulations the managing body of an airport is required to take the necessary measures to ensure that any fee charged for access to airport installations is determined according to relevant, objective, transparent and non-discriminatory criteria.

Ryanair said passengers who booked online and brought with them hand luggage should not be charged the same as those who used airport check- in facilities.

Herbert Smith partner Julian Copeman instructed Mark Hoskins QC, also of Brick Court, for Gatwick.

The CAA upheld the appeal on the grounds that Gatwick's internet check- in charge was not based on objective criteria.

Over time Ryanair had increased its share of passengers carrying no hold baggage but Gatwick had not reviewed its relative check-in charges.

The criteria Gatwick applied to formulating the charges were not transparent and users were unable to gain an understanding of how precisely their charges had been calculated.

However, the CAA rejected claims that the 'bundling' of check-in and baggage related charges was, of itself, evidence of discriminatory conduct.

Copyright: Centaur Communications Ltd. and licensors

Abu Dhabi fund hit.

Abu Dhabi fund hit by Madoff scam An Abu Dhabi government-owned fund may have fallen victim to the massive US pyramid fraud that conned investors around the world, reports claimed yesterday. The New York Times said the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) - the world's biggest sovereign wealth fund with assets estimated at up to $875 billion - had indirectly put $400 million into Bernard Madoff's scheme in 2005. "The investment authority had invested approximately $400 million with Mr Madoff, by way of the Fairfield Sentry Fund, according to a profile of the firm that it prepared for a prospective buyer in 2007," the newspaper wrote. "Fairfield Sentry had more than $7 billion invested with Mr Madoff and was his largest investor; now, it says, it is his largest victim." The New York Times said ADIA was one of Fairfield Sentry's biggest investors, and even though it took "two significant redemptions" from the fund in April 2005 and 2006, its $132 million stake the following year still made up two per cent of the fund's assets under management. The level of ADIA's exposure to Madoff's Ponzi scheme at the time of its collapse was not clear, and the authority could not be reached for comment. But Abu Dhabi yesterday set up a new financial watchdog - named as the Abu Dhabi Accountability Authority - to ensure state "resources and funds are managed, collected and expended efficiently", the WAM news agency reported. The UAE is one of the top ten countries looking for information on Madoff, who is now under 24-hour house arrest in New York, according to analysis by DubaiBeat.com on Google search trends.

2007 Al Sidra Media LLC

Provided by Syndigate.info an Albawaba.com company

New Information Systems Study Findings Reported from University of Munster.

"An overview of the literature on Internet social networking (ISN) is presented. The authors identify four dominant streams of research and review the key contributions to the field," scientists in Munster, Germany report.

"The review reveals that the research field is fragmented and does not yet facilitate a general understanding of the phenomenon. In particular research is very much skewed towards certain user groups (e. g., students) and platforms (in particular Facebook). Further, implications for a corporate context are discussed. In doing so, three contexts of application are differentiated: Social network sites (SNSs) for 1) recruiting and professional career development, 2) relationship facilitation in distributed work contexts, and 3) interactions with end customers. The authors discuss SNS potentials, implications of existing ISN research and future research opportunities," wrote D. Richter and colleagues, University of Munster.

The researchers concluded: "In summary, they seek to contribute to a better understanding of the phenomenon of ISN and to making available the current state of ISN research for the wider Enterprise 2."

Richter and colleagues published their study in Business & Information Systems Engineering (Internet Social Networking Research State of the Art and Implications for Enterprise 2.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2011;3(2):89-101).

For more information, contact D. Richter, University of Munster, Institute Wirtschaftsinformat, Lehrstuhl Wirtschaftsinformat & Interorg Systems, Leonardo Campus 3, D-48149 Munster, GERMANY.

Publisher contact information for the journal Business & Information Systems Engineering is: Springer Heidelberg, Tiergartenstrasse 17, D-69121 Heidelberg, Germany.

Keywords: City:Munster, Country:Germany, Region:Europe, Engineering, Information Systems, Information Technology, Information and Data Systems

This article was prepared by Information Technology Newsweekly editors from staff and other reports. Copyright 2011, Information Technology Newsweekly via VerticalNews.com.

Apple Reduces Prices on Cinema Displays.


Apple(R) today announced that it has made its award-winning line of widescreen flat panel Cinema Displays more affordable than ever by reducing the price of the 20-inch model to just $799 and the 23-inch HD model to just $1,499. In addition, Apple's new 2.7 GHz Power Mac(R) G5s and 1.67 GHz 17-inch PowerBooks now feature built-in support to directly drive Apple's groundbreaking 30-inch Cinema HD Display, saving customers hundreds of dollars.

"Apple's Cinema Displays now start at just $799, making widescreen flat displays affordable to even more people," said Philip Schiller, Apple's senior vice president of Worldwide Product Marketing. "Even Apple's groundbreaking 30-inch Cinema HD Display, with its over four million pixels, is now made more affordable with standard support built into some PowerMac G5 and PowerBook configurations."

Apple's flat panel display line, comprising the 20-inch Cinema Display, the 23-inch Cinema HD Display and revolutionary 30-inch Cinema HD Display, is designed to work with DVI-equipped Power Mac G5 desktops, PowerBook(R) G4 notebooks and Windows-based computers, and offers the widescreen design (16:10 ratio) coveted by creative professionals who want access to more screen real estate.

The 30-inch Cinema HD Display has an industry-leading 2560-by-1600 pixel resolution and the 23-inch Cinema HD Display has a 1920-by-1200 pixel resolution, ideal for editing High Definition Television (HDTV) content. The 20-inch Cinema Display professional-quality flat panel offers a 1680-by-1050 pixel resolution, more than enough space to edit full size images with plenty of room for on-screen palettes. 

Two systems now feature built-in support for Apple's breakthrough 30-inch Cinema HD Display: the new 2.7 GHz Power Mac G5 and the 1.67 GHz 17-inch PowerBook. Users can also add support for the 30-inch Cinema HD Display as a build-to-order option on the new 2.0 GHz and 2.3 GHz Power Mac G5 systems, as well as the 1.67 GHz 15-inch PowerBook.

Apple Cinema Displays deliver the superior color performance needed to meet the rigorous standards for SWOP-certified display-based proofing systems.* With display-based proofing systems, print professionals can approve jobs for press production onscreen without the need for hard-copy proofs, resulting in significant time and cost savings. Apple flat panel displays provide a broad color gamut and maximum color quality using the industry's best wide-viewing angle technology of up to 170 degrees even when viewing images off-axis.

Apple Cinema Displays feature an all aluminum design with a very thin bezel, suspended by an aluminum stand with an adjustable hinge that makes tilting the display almost effortless. Each Cinema Display features two FireWire(R) 400 ports and two USB 2.0 ports, and support the Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) mounting interface standard.

Pricing & Availability

The 20-inch Cinema Display, 23-inch Cinema HD Display and the 30-inch Cinema HD Display are available through the Apple Store(R) (http://www.apple.com/), at Apple's retail stores and Apple Authorized Resellers for a suggested retail price of $799 (US), $1,499 (US) and $2,999 (US), respectively. Power Mac G5 build-to-order options for the Cinema Display line include the NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL with 256MB DDR SDRAM for an additional $350 (US) as well as a standalone kit for a suggested retail price of $599 (US) through the Apple Store (http://www.apple.com/).

*Certified systems are capable of producing proofs visually identical to the SWOP Certified Press Proof as defined in ANSI CGATS TR 001, Graphic Technology.

Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the Macintosh. Today, Apple continues to lead the industry in innovation with its award-winning desktop and notebook computers, OS X operating system, and iLife and professional applications. Apple is also spearheading the digital music revolution with its iPod portable music players and iTunes online music store.

NOTE: Apple, the Apple logo, Mac, Mac OS, Macintosh, Power Mac, PowerBook, FireWire and Apple Store are trademarks of Apple. Other company and product names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

SUPPLY CHAIN STANDARD VIEWPOINT: Back to the future.

The futurists of the 1990s loved ideas like the intelligent fridge or thinking waste-bin - in our digital age perhaps it is time to revisit these concepts which might just transform logistics.

Presentations and workshops may be the key attraction at many conferences, but it is often the unexpected conversations over coffee or lunch that prove the most memorable.

Extended Supply Chain in April certainly had its high points, but for me one of the more memorable events was chatting to Sergio Barbarino who has the prosaic job title of "principal engineer" at Procter and Gamble's Supply Network Innovation Centre in Belgium. With a forward- looking brief, Barbarino has thought through not just the environmental and logistics issues of home delivery, but also changing consumer attitudes and the role of brands. In future, he argues, why shouldn't local delivery become a utility - much like our gas, water and electricity, where consumers can contract with a single provider for all their needs? Rather than have a succession of delivery drivers calling at our doors why not have one van which comes at a pre-set time and will delivery our groceries, internet purchases, pet food, washing powder or whatever? And why not "contract" with our other regular suppliers to provide what we need via this local delivery operator on an annual basis?

Transformed

My dog eats on average 10.5 tins of dog food a week so why not arrange to have 21 assorted tins delivered every other Wednesday throughout the year? The household generally uses two lavatory rolls a week - so why not have 26 dropped at the door every three months? With sufficient such regular orders, manufacturers' production planning and scheduling would be transformed along with better cost management and targeted promotional incentives for consumers buying direct. With a single local carrier collating orders and delivering at a time to suit the shopper, fuel consumption, congestion and traffic pollution would be reduced giving an environmentally-friendly solution that is a win-win for everyone concerned.

The idea, or close variants of it, is not new: what must by now be 20 years ago I remember a presentation from Forrester Research where the speaker (name now long forgotten) argued that the waste-bin of the future would be able to read barcodes and so to tell when he threw away a tube of toothpaste and automatically order another one (he suggested from P&G) which could be sent by post so that he never had to remember to buy the stuff and never ran out. Forrester's futurist scenario saw consumers "contracting" with companies like Procter & Gamble to supply toothpaste, and other necessary but rather dreary commodities, on such an annual basis.

Such concepts as this "intelligent waste-bin" - or the equally intelligent fridge which would tell you when the contents were approaching their use-by date - were favourites with the futurists of the 80s and 90s but rarely turned into reality. Equally popular was the multi-talented milk float providing a daily delivery not just of your milk but of other groceries, internet shopping, pet food, washing powder, etc. That idea didn't really catch on either.

So will Sergio Barbarino's "carrier-as-utility" concept fare rather better? Certainly some of our major supermarkets have attempted to deliver rather more than just your weekly groceries - although these have tended to be their own products rather than those from third parties. Equally Amazon provides a single source for a vast range of goods, although there is no attempt to collate deliveries. From a consumer perspective having a single carrier to deliver everything at a suitable time sounds like bliss - especially for anyone who has ever taken a day off work to wait in for furniture or a "must-be-signed-for" delivery which invariably arrives at around 5pm; or has had to delay supper until late at night because the internet groceries containing the meal's ingredients are a couple of hours past their delivery slot.

Discount

Equally significant is the prospect that such systems would bypass the high street entirely. Buying direct from a manufacturer, or from an online portal which includes primary producers, and "contracting" to have your basic requirements met for a year or six months at a discount would certainly streamline the weekly shopping list and could well prove to be a popular option - especially for those of us who invariably run out of something vital at the wrong moment. It could also be a welcome option for those many suppliers who are becoming rather tired of the aggressive buying policies which certain major supermarkets have had on their margins and profitability.

In the USA vendor managed inventory (VMI), where producers take responsibility for servicing and stocking their products in-store, is of course far more commonplace than here. Translate the VMI concept into a web portal and marry it with a carrier who will collate and deliver everything ordered in a single drop at the ideal time and Barbarino and the futurists at P&G may be on to a winner. Factor in a weekly instalment payment programme so shoppers are not hit with a mega- bill for loo rolls every three months and a network of local carriers with flexible hours competing for the "utility" business and home delivery might just turn out to be rather more fraught than it can be at present - and possibly rather more profitable for all concerned.

Copyright: Centaur Communications Ltd. and licensors

Saturday, February 25, 2012

UC Irvine School of Law to Present Chancellor's Chair Lecture by Prof. Tony Reese April 26.

IRVINE, Calif. -- UC Irvine School of Law will present a Chancellor's Chair Lecture by Prof. Tony Reese on copyright protection of creative work on April 26.

WHAT: The lecture, "What Copyright Owes the Future: Preserving Access to Creative Works," will explore how changes in law and technology may create obstacles to keeping creative works available to audiences, both now and in the future, and how copyright law might respond to those obstacles.

WHO: Prof. Reese is a leading scholar in the field of copyright and has published numerous articles on copyright law and digital copyright issues in a variety of U.S. and foreign law reviews and collections. He is a co-author of the casebooks Copyright, Patent, Trademark and Related State Doctrines (with Paul Goldstein), Copyright (with Robert Gorman & Jane Ginsburg), and Internet Commerce (with Margaret Jane Radin & John Rothchild). He joined the faculty of UC Irvine School of Law in July 2009 after 10 years of teaching at University of Texas at Austin, School of Law. He has been a visiting professor at Stanford and New York University, and has taught copyright law in several international programs.

Chancellor's Chairs are endowed positions awarded to a very small number of UC Irvine professors across the campus who demonstrate unusual academic merit.

WHEN: Tuesday, April 26, 4:30 to 5:30 pm; reception to follow.

WHERE: Room EDU 1131, UC Irvine School of Law, 401 East Peltason Drive, Irvine, Calif., 92697-8000. Map and directions to UCI Law

COST: Free with reservation and open to the public; reception follows. One hour of MCLE credit is available. RSVP & questions: events@law.uci.edu or (949) 824-2921.

ABOUT UC IRVINE SCHOOL OF LAW: Opened in August, 2009, UC Irvine School of Law seeks to create the ideal law school for the 21st century by doing the best job of training lawyers for the practice of law at the highest levels of the profession. Recruited from prestigious schools, the faculty ranked 9th in the country in scholarly impact in a recent study. The first two classes of students have median grades and LSAT scores comparable to those of classes at top 20 law schools. The school's innovative curriculum stresses hands-on learning, interdisciplinary study and public service. www.law.uci.edu